Harim Peiris

Political and Reconciliation perspectives from Sri Lanka

  • April 2011
    M T W T F S S
    « Mar   May »
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    252627282930  

The UN experts report – some food for thought

Posted by harimpeiris on April 21, 2011

The UN panel of experts has submitted their report to the UN Secretary General, who in turn has forwarded it to the Government of Sri Lanka and consequently we have the executive summary leaked to the media to inform the reading public. The government has promised a full response and as we await the response and perhaps the publication of the full report, some preliminary comments on the report has become the public political discourse.

 

Post war policies criticized

The panel is quite critical of the post war policies of the government, including the continuation of the state of emergency, in the context of the absence of an armed rebellion against the state. The general lack of movement towards national reconciliation through addressing the effects and causes of the war, including a focus on the civilian victims of the conflict has also come in for criticism by the experts. The entire world was very supportive of Sri Lanka’s war against terrorism; let us not forget that from the US, to the EU, from India to Canada the LTTE became a banned organization. The world, armed, equipped and supported our war in various ways. However there has been growing international opprobrium at our post war policies, which began with the extended and mass internship of civilians in Vavuniya, the continuation of the emergency in peace time, the absence of any relief to civilian war victims, the continued de-facto military rule in the North, the absence of an elected Northern Provincial Council and generally what might be seen as the absence of a just peace in the North.

 

Reconciliation needed because the conflict was ethnic in nature

Sri Lanka’s conflict was ethnic in nature and expression. The war was fought by an almost exclusively Sinhala army against an exclusively Tamil LTTE, a few Muslims on both sides bringing in the only diversity. Though we finally united the country geographically there is much more work to be done to unite our deeply divided society. That attempt from the government’s snail paced structured dialogue with the TNA, to the opaque and non inclusive rehabilitation program, including the complete absence of any relief for the civilian victims of the conflict have made a major section of the international community, who were are friends in time of war, to be weary of the type of peace we seek to create.

 

No domestic appetite for war crimes probe

There is absolutely no domestic appetite for a war crimes probe into events that happened in the final days of the conflict. Absolutely none in the Sinhala areas and even in the Tamil communities of the North, it is a more nuanced response as witnessed in the balanced and cautious response of the TNA. The LTTE was responsible for consistent and considerable war crimes, against the Tamil community including child conscription and latterly the point blank murder of Tamil civilians trying to escape the fighting. This is of course in addition to terrorist attacks on civilians in the South. However, the entire leadership of the LTTE is now dead or with the government, like Karuna and KP and hence outside the reach of justice. Accordingly a probe is now one sided in that it will simply target the victorious Sri Lankan security forces. An outcome that few, if any in Sri Lanka will want or accept. The allegations raised however of the use of artillery and heavy weapons into the designated safe zones and hospitals may need to be investigated and addressed in some form.

 

Western double standards

Some government media have begun to discuss so called western double standards, for ignoring civilian causalities in wars fought by the West in Iraq and Afghanistan and focusing instead on Sri Lanka. However, two wrongs do not make a right and legally, violations of international humanitarian law (IHL) and rules of war in one theatre of operation does not thereby justify or exonerate it in another. The UN while ignoring Iraq and focusing on Sri Lanka, is a bit like Sri Lanka’s Attorney General who withdrew murder and rape charges against government politicians, decried by even the Hon. Chief Justice in an interview to the BBC, continuing to prosecute murders and rapes committed by the politically disposed. As the Attorney General will tell us, he is free to prosecute some while ignoring others. Unfair, but true in Sri Lanka and true in the world.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: